Estimated reading time: 4 minutes
Both Amazon DynamoDB and MongoDB offer capabilities for working with vector embeddings, but they approach it with different underlying architectures and strengths. Choosing the right database depends on your specific use case, scalability requirements, query patterns, and existing infrastructure.
DynamoDB for Vector Embedding
DynamoDB, a fully managed NoSQL key-value store by AWS, has recently added more robust features for vector embeddings, primarily through integrations with other AWS services like Amazon OpenSearch Service or through dedicated vector store integrations like SvectorDB or LlamaIndex’s DynamoDBVectorStore. AWS also announced vector search capabilities directly within DynamoDB at re:Invent 2023.
Key Considerations for DynamoDB:
- Scalability and Performance: DynamoDB is renowned for its horizontal scalability and consistent low-latency performance at high traffic volumes.
- Managed Service: Being a fully managed service, DynamoDB handles infrastructure management, backups, and scaling automatically.
- Integration with AWS Ecosystem: Seamless integration with other AWS services is a significant advantage.
- Query Limitations: Traditionally, DynamoDB’s querying capabilities were limited to key-value lookups and scans. Vector search often relies on integrations with services like OpenSearch or specialized vector stores to overcome these limitations. However, native vector search is evolving.
- Document Size Limit: DynamoDB has a strict document size limit (400KB), which might impact how you store vectors alongside other data. Larger vectors might require workarounds.
- Data Consistency: DynamoDB offers eventual consistency by default, which might be a concern for some vector search applications requiring strong consistency.
MongoDB for Vector Embedding
MongoDB, a flexible document-oriented NoSQL database, has built-in support for storing and indexing vector embeddings through its Atlas Vector Search feature. This allows you to store vector embeddings directly within your MongoDB documents and perform efficient similarity searches using the $vectorSearch aggregation stage.
Key Considerations for MongoDB:
- Flexible Data Model: MongoDB’s schema-less document model allows you to easily store vector embeddings alongside other related data in a single document.
- Rich Query Language: MongoDB offers a powerful query language with aggregation capabilities, making it easier to combine vector search with other filtering and data manipulation operations.
- Atlas Vector Search: MongoDB Atlas provides a fully integrated vector search solution with various distance metrics and indexing options (like HNSW).
- Document Size Limit: MongoDB has a larger document size limit (16MB), providing more flexibility for embedding vectors and associated data.
- Deployment Options: MongoDB offers various deployment options, including a fully managed cloud service (Atlas), self-managed deployments, and hybrid cloud setups.
- Data Consistency: MongoDB offers strong consistency as its default, which can be important for maintaining data accuracy in vector search applications.
Summary: DynamoDB vs MongoDB for Vector Embedding
| Feature | DynamoDB | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Core Data Model | Key-Value Store (with NoSQL features) | Document Database |
| Vector Search Approach | Primarily via integrations (OpenSearch, specialized vector stores), evolving native support. | Integrated Atlas Vector Search. |
| Query Capabilities | Limited native querying; vector search often relies on external services. | Rich query language with powerful aggregation pipeline including $vectorSearch. |
| Scalability | Highly scalable, consistent performance. | Scalable, especially with MongoDB Atlas. |
| Managed Service | Fully managed by AWS. | Fully managed (Atlas) and self-managed options. |
| Document Size Limit | 400 KB (can be restrictive for large vectors). | 16 MB (more flexible for embedding vectors and data). |
| Data Consistency | Eventual consistency by default. | Strong consistency by default. |
| Ecosystem Integration | Tight integration with the AWS ecosystem. | Broad ecosystem and community support. |
Choose DynamoDB if: You are heavily invested in the AWS ecosystem, require extreme scalability and low latency, and are comfortable managing vector search through integrations or its evolving native capabilities, while being mindful of document size limits and eventual consistency.
Choose MongoDB if: You prefer a flexible document model, need a rich query language with integrated vector search (Atlas Vector Search), require strong consistency, and desire more flexibility in deployment options and document size.
Leave a Reply